Executive Summary
A major North American energy services company faced a substantial Microsoft compliance bill during an annual True-Up review. When they received a $1.3 million bill detailing compliance issues across their Microsoft licenses, the Director of Procurement recognized the urgent need for expert guidance and enlisted LicenseFortress for audit defense. Through a meticulous review of the company’s licensing entitlements and infrastructure, LicenseFortress uncovered misinterpretations in the audit, including overlooked MSDN licenses that cover non-production environments. This proactive defense strategy successfully reduced the audit liability from $1.3 million to $270,000, yielding over $1 million in savings and a remarkable 2,465% ROI.
$40K
Project Cost
$1.1M
Savings
2,465%
ROI
Challenges
Microsoft’s True-Up review led to a projected compliance cost of over $1.3 million due to complex licensing structures, particularly for SQL Server and BizTalk Server. The energy company’s large, virtualized, and hybrid infrastructure presented unique challenges:
At a Glance
1. Core-Based Licensing Compliance
The core-based licensing model required accurate licensing of all physical and virtual cores, which is challenging in multi-server setups, creating a risk of over-licensing or compliance penalties.
2. Virtual Machine Restrictions
Extensive virtualization added compliance risks, with specific rules around license allocation across virtual environments needing careful adherence.
3. Hybrid Cloud Licensing Models
The company used Microsoft’s Azure Hybrid Benefit, which required close tracking to ensure compliance across on-premises and cloud setups.
4. Frequent Changes in Microsoft’s Licensing Terms
Microsoft’s updates, especially for SQL Server, presented compliance challenges for distributed IT infrastructures like those in the energy sector.
5. Over-Licensing and Cost Optimization
Seeking a balance between compliance and cost savings, the company needed optimized licensing strategies.
6. Compliance in Distributed Environments
Maintaining compliance across servers, virtual machines, and hybrid setups required comprehensive tracking and management during the True-Up.
Solution
LicenseFortress identified a critical oversight in the initial assessment conducted by KPMG, who had misinterpreted Microsoft’s licensing requirements for non-production environments. The auditors overlooked the company’s MSDN licensing, a specialized subscription that covers software use in development and testing environments without incurring additional licensing costs. MSDN licenses allow access to nearly all Microsoft software for non-production purposes—such as development, testing, and staging—without requiring separate licensing for each instance. This exemption helps companies reduce costs by eliminating unnecessary charges in non-production environments. LicenseFortress’ team diligently reviewed these details, uncovering and addressing the discrepancy in KPMG’s assessment.
Their actions included:
1. Precise Core-Based License Optimization:
For products like SQL Server Enterprise, where the majority of savings were found, LicenseFortress could emphasize their targeted approach to core-based licensing. This would include aligning core counts with actual usage and leveraging specific entitlements to avoid over-licensing in virtualized environments.
2. Customized Entitlement Application:
Given the significant savings on BizTalk Server, LicenseFortress’ actions could highlight a careful review of the licensing entitlements applicable to production and non-production environments, especially focusing on overlooked MSDN coverage. This attention to specific entitlements would show their role in reducing costs by ensuring compliance without unnecessary licenses.
3. Cost Control in Distributed and Hybrid Setups:
With savings achieved across both on-premises (like Windows Datacenter) and cloud-enabled products (such as through Azure Hybrid Benefit), LicenseFortress could emphasize their expertise in hybrid environments. Their approach could reflect how they optimized licensing across both cloud and on-premises setups, reducing excess costs in distributed infrastructures.
4. Using ArxAware:
LicenseFortress utilized ArxAware, LicenseFortress’ proprietary SAM tool, to actively review licensing deployments and entitlements across the company’s infrastructure. This tool allowed them to accurately identify where licenses, such as Project Server and Exchange Server, were deployed, ensuring that each product’s entitlements were fully leveraged, and any unnecessary licensing costs were eliminated.
Results
LicenseFortress’ intervention led to a significant reduction of the audit bill from nearly $1.3 million to $270,000, delivering over $1 million in savings. With a 2,465% ROI on their $40,000 annual investment, the energy company remains well-prepared to manage Microsoft licensing demands in complex, virtualized environments.
- Windows Datacenter
- Original Cost: $60,164.16
- Savings: $8,595
- Adjusted Cost: $51,569.28
- SQL Server Enterprise
- Original Cost: $735,756.00
- Savings: $649,043
- Adjusted Cost: $86,712.96
- Exchange Server Enterprise
- Original Cost: $20,831.28
- Savings: $3,788
- Adjusted Cost: $17,043.60
- Project Server
- Original Cost: $14,566.68
- Savings: $2,648
- Adjusted Cost: $11,918.28
- BizTalk Server Enterprise
- Original Cost: $465,206.76
- Savings: $361,827
- Adjusted Cost: $103,379.28
- Total Original Cost: $1,296,524.88
- Total Savings: $1,025,901
- Final Adjusted Cost: $270,623.90
Confidently Navigate Microsoft True-Ups with LicenseFortress
Microsoft True-Ups can reveal costly compliance issues if licensing requirements aren’t fully understood and applied correctly. Just as LicenseFortress helped uncover overlooked entitlements and saved our client over $1 million, we can ensure your licensing is accurately counted, avoiding unnecessary fees. Ready to make the most of your Microsoft entitlements?
Book a meeting today to learn how LicenseFortress can help achieve lasting compliance and cost savings.
