Executive Summary
After successfully resolving $84 million in Oracle Database and Middleware compliance gaps in Oracle Database and Middleware compliance gaps, a major water and sewer company once again turned to them—this time for Oracle Java. Facing $259,200 in unnecessary annual costs under Oracle’s employee-based subscription model, the company engaged LicenseFortress for a Compliance and Optimization Review (COR). The review revealed significant over-purchasing driven by inflated employee counts and tracking errors. By realigning entitlements to actual needs and correcting compliance risks, the company cut $259,200 in costs annually. With a $35,000 project cost, the engagement delivered a 640% ROI.
$35K
Project Cost
$260K
Annual Savings
640%
ROI
Challenges
Oracle’s shift from free Java to a paid subscription model—priced by total employee headcount—forced organizations to pay across the enterprise, regardless of actual usage. For this water and sewer provider, the model created three key challenges:
At a Glance
1. Complex Licensing Rules
The company struggled to navigate Oracle’s changing Java agreements, including employee-based subscriptions and tiered pricing models. Without clear insight into how usage mapped to these rules, managing costs and compliance was nearly impossible.
2. Inflated Licensing Costs
The organization had purchased licenses for 1,800 employees at $12 each, despite actual usage being much lower. As a result, they were on track to pay $259,200 annually for entitlements they did not need.
3. Compliance Exposure
Errors in employee tracking meant reported usage was inaccurate, creating a risk that Oracle could claim under-licensing during an audit. The company needed clarity to ensure compliance and avoid unexpected penalties.
Solution
To address these challenges, the company engaged LicenseFortress for a COR—a deep analysis of technical deployments and contractual entitlements.
- Discovery of Usage
LicenseFortress performed a full assessment of Java deployments across desktops, servers, and applications. This revealed that only a fraction of the workforce actively required Oracle Java, yet the entire headcount had been licensed. - Validation of Entitlements
Entitlements were compared against actual deployments, exposing significant over-purchasing and tracking errors. These inaccuracies not only inflated costs but also created potential audit risks. - Correction of Tracking Systems
LicenseFortress worked with IT and procurement teams to fix employee tracking, ensuring license counts accurately reflected reality rather than inflated system reports. - Optimization of Licensing Strategy
By aligning the company to the correct employee tier, LicenseFortress eliminated unnecessary costs while ensuring the business remained compliant with Oracle’s agreements. - Safeguards for the Future
As part of ongoing support through the ArxPlatform, LicenseFortress provided continuous monitoring and safeguards to prevent over-licensing from reoccurring.
Results
Through this engagement, the water and sewer company was able to:
- Eliminate $259,200 in recurring annual costs by correcting inflated employee counts and over-purchasing.
- Achieve a 640% ROI on a $35,000 investment.
- Strengthen compliance by removing tracking errors and aligning licensing with actual usage.
- Gain lasting assurance through ongoing monitoring with the ArxPlatform.
By addressing both cost and compliance, the company ensured it would no longer be caught in Oracle’s all-or-nothing pricing trap—achieving substantial savings and peace of mind.
Facing the Oracle Java Pricing Changes?
LicenseFortress specializes in navigating the complexities of Oracle Java licensing. Our team will help you identify cost-saving opportunities, mitigate compliance risks, and/or transition to alternative technologies. Achieve substantial savings and long-term compliance with our expert guidance.
Learn more about how we can help you navigate these challenges and secure a more stable future for your organization.