Skip to main content
    Back to Industry Insights
    Procurement
    Business Practices
    Oracle

    Unpopular Opinion: It's Your Responsibility to Purchase the Right Software, Not the Vendors

    Blaming vendors for selling you the wrong licenses won't protect you in an audit. The hard truth: procurement owns the risk. Here's how to build an internal process that ensures you're buying what you actually need — not what a sales rep wants to sell.

    Michael Corey

    Michael Corey

    Co-Founder & COO, LicenseFortress

    January 2024
    6 min read
    Unpopular Opinion: It's Your Responsibility to Purchase the Right Software, Not the Vendors

    The Challenge of Choosing Right

    It's a familiar concern: the apprehension of selecting the wrong software licenses, a scenario fraught with potential pitfalls and complexities inherent in the software procurement process. Importantly, this worry is compounded by the marketplace, where vendors, driven by the pursuit of sales, might not always align their recommendations with your organization's best interests, leading to the risk of misinformation or, in worse cases, deceptive practices. However big the deceit, the procurement responsibility lies with one person, and that is you.

    The Oracle Example

    Previously, Oracle has faced allegations related to its sales practices, particularly concerning the way it has been accused of inflating its cloud sales numbers. Specifically, one significant claim against Oracle is that it artificially boosted its cloud sales figures by selling cloud products to customers, potentially including products that customers did not need. Consequently, this practice could involve selling additional services or products to pad sales in specific departments, raising concerns about the transparency and ethics of Oracle's sales strategies.

    The Ethical Dilemma

    Furthermore, the crux of the issue lies in navigating these turbulent waters with a strategy that emphasizes due diligence, critical evaluation, and a commitment to ethical engagement from both sides. Essentially, it's about adopting a proactive stance, where detailed research, clear understanding of your organizational needs, and an insistence on transparency from vendors become your guiding principles.

    The Consequences of Misguided Sales

    Sales representatives selling the wrong products intentionally is unethical and detrimental to both the customer and the vendor. Here's why:

    1. Loss of Trust: Purposefully selling the wrong products damages trust between the customer and the vendor, leading to potential loss of business and reputation.
    2. Customer Dissatisfaction: Customers rely on sales reps to provide solutions for their needs. Selling the wrong products can lead to dissatisfaction and frustration.
    3. Legal Ramifications: It could lead to legal issues regarding misrepresentation and breach of contract, especially in the case of software license compliance.
    4. Long-term Consequences: While such tactics might lead to short-term gains, they harm long-term relationships and repeat business opportunities.
    5. Ethical Responsibility: Salespeople have an ethical responsibility to act in the best interests of their clients and their company.

    What Should You Do Next?

    Recognizing these challenges presented by vendor sales tactics, here's how to take control of your software selection process:

    1. Conduct Proactive Research

    Undertake thorough research on potential software solutions to ensure alignment with your specific organizational needs and goals. This includes a deep dive into the software's features, capabilities, and how well it integrates with current systems and future growth plans.

    2. Apply Critical Evaluation

    Adopt a discerning approach to vendor claims and suggestions. Actively seek unbiased reviews, case studies, and user feedback to gain a balanced understanding of software's efficacy and reliability.

    3. Perform Due Diligence

    Validate vendor credentials, scrutinize the details of licensing agreements, and weigh the long-term implications of committing to specific software solutions.

    4. Demand Ethical Engagement

    Advocate for a relationship built on transparency and integrity. Clearly articulate your requirements and expect vendors to offer solutions that truly meet those needs.

    5. Own Your Decision-Making

    Despite the intricacies of the software marketplace, the ultimate decision-making power lies with your organization. A steadfast commitment to meticulous research, critical assessment, and principled interactions throughout the procurement process drives this empowerment.

    While it is indeed unethical for sales representatives to intentionally or unintentionally promote unsuitable products, the ultimate responsibility rests with businesses to ensure they make informed buying decisions that align with their specific needs. This underscores the importance of due diligence and a proactive approach in the procurement process, empowering businesses to discern and select the most appropriate solutions, thereby avoiding the pitfalls of misguided sales tactics. Compare the available support models in 3 Approaches to Software Procurement.

    From our case files

    What buying without licensing review looked like for one manufacturer:

    Browse all client results

    About the author

    Michael Corey

    Michael Corey

    Co-Founder & COO, LicenseFortress

    Michael writes on vendor strategy, audit behavior and the business realities of enterprise software agreements.