Oracle v. Rimini Street Timeline and Customer Implications

Monday, 14 August, 2023

The Oracle v. Rimini Street legal battle was a significant event in the software industry. The dispute centered on copyright infringement, with Oracle asserting that Rimini Street had improperly accessed, copied, and distributed Oracle’s proprietary software while providing third-party support services to Oracle customers.

Detailed Overview of the Court Proceedings

Initial Lawsuit

Oracle initiated the lawsuit in 2010, alleging that Rimini Street and its CEO, Seth Ravin, were involved in “massive theft” of Oracle’s intellectual property. They argued that Rimini used Oracle’s software in an unauthorized manner to offer support services to Oracle’s customers at a lower price.

Rimini Street’s Response

Rimini Street did not deny using Oracle software to provide support but claimed they always acted within the rights granted to their clients through their Oracle license agreements. They also emphasized that they replaced the processes in question after Oracle raised concerns.

2014 Proceedings

In 2014, both parties agreed on certain facts before trial. Rimini Street admitted to some infringements regarding Oracle’s PeopleSoft product but contested the broader allegations.

2015 Ruling

A federal jury in Las Vegas ruled in favor of Oracle in 2015, awarding them $50 million in damages. The court found that Rimini Street had infringed on copyrights for Oracle’s PeopleSoft, Siebel, and Oracle Database software.

2018 Ruling

In 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reduced the original award. It confirmed that Rimini Street had infringed on Oracle copyrights but stated that some of Oracle’s infringement claims were based on “non-copyrightable work” and that certain costs awarded as damages were inappropriate.

Supreme Court Involvement

The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court over a dispute about the appropriate costs that should be compensated in copyright infringement cases. In 2019, the Supreme Court sided with Rimini Street, ruling that Oracle could only recover costs explicitly outlined in the U.S. Copyright Act.

Final Settlement

The protracted litigation finally concluded in 2020 when Oracle and Rimini Street announced a settlement. As part of the settlement, Rimini Street would pay Oracle an additional $13 million, and both parties would refrain from litigating over related issues in the future.

2023 Ruling

On August 7th, 2023, a recent judgment mandated that Rimini Street “cease and desist from utilizing and operating” various software components, including certain automated tools and the Code Analyser. Additionally, the company has been directed to release a “rectifying” press statement “within 30 days” following the Monday injunction.



The case was significant for the software industry, especially for those companies in the third-party support market. It highlighted the importance of understanding and adhering to software licensing agreements.

Clarified Boundries

The court rulings also clarified the boundaries of copyright law as it pertains to software, setting a precedent for future cases.

For Customers

The case underscores the importance of understanding license agreements, evaluating the risks and benefits of third-party support, and staying informed about the changing dynamics in the software industry.

Protection of Intellectual Property (IP)

The case underscored the importance of software vendors protecting their intellectual property. Software licenses are typically very specific about what is and isn’t allowed, and vendors like Oracle will vigorously defend their rights.

Clarification on Third-Party Support Rights

Customers often seek third-party vendors like Rimini Street to provide software support because it can be more cost-effective than getting support directly from the original software vendor. The case brought more clarity (though not without contention) to what third-party support providers can and cannot do regarding accessing and using proprietary software.

Potential Increase in Costs

The legal victory for Oracle might make other third-party support providers more cautious, leading to increased operational costs. These costs might be passed on to customers in the form of higher prices.

Review of License Agreements

Customers should be thorough in understanding their software license agreements, especially when they opt for third-party support. Ensuring that the third-party provider adheres to the terms of the license agreement is crucial to avoiding legal troubles.

Awareness & Risk

For businesses, this case serves as a reminder of the potential risks associated with using third-party services. Companies might need to weigh the cost savings of third-party support against the potential risks and make informed decisions.

Vendor Relationship Dynamics

Such cases might strain the relationship between primary software vendors and third-party support providers, which can influence the broader ecosystem and dynamics in the enterprise software market.

Innovation and Competition

While Oracle’s stance might be seen as protecting its IP rights, there are concerns about stifling competition. A vibrant third-party support ecosystem can drive innovation and cost savings, but excessive litigation or perceived aggressive IP protection might deter new entrants from coming into the space.

In summary, the Oracle v. Rimini Street case had significant implications for the enterprise software landscape, particularly regarding third-party software support. Customers need to be vigilant and informed about their rights, the specifics of their software license agreements, and the practices of any third-party vendors they engage with.